“Those whose minds are distorted by material desires surrender unto demigods and follow the particular rules and regulations of worship according to their own natures.” (Lord Krishna, Bhagavad-gita, 7.20)
Download this episode (right click and save)
कामैस् तैस् तैर् हृत-ज्ञानाः
प्रपद्यन्ते ऽन्य-देवताः
तं तं नियमम् आस्थाय
प्रकृत्या नियताः स्वया
kāmais tais tair hṛta-jñānāḥ
prapadyante 'nya-devatāḥ
taṁ taṁ niyamam āsthāya
prakṛtyā niyatāḥ svayā
Friend1: I think one of the biggest crimes you can commit in modern day bhakti-yoga practice is having any sort of worship of someone who isn’t Vishnu directly.
Friend2: Are you referring to “demigod” worship?
Friend1: Yes.
Friend2: Who is bringing forth the charges? You mentioned “crime.”
Friend1: Let’s say it’s an established institution. The example we’ll use here is a wedding. Someone who is officially within the order [they have been duly initiated] wants to hold a wedding for someone in the family.
Friend2: Oh, you know there is some worship of Ganesha at the beginning.
Friend1: Exactly! Others who are planning to attend, sort of like the police officers in the institution, they strongly object.
Friend2: Why is that?
Friend1: Because Ganesha is a demigod. It’s worship for a material purpose.
Friend2: Are you serious with this?
Friend1: Why do you think I am bringing this up?
Friend2: It is quite common to worship that beloved son of Shiva and Parvati at the beginning of important ceremonies. In the marriage of Sita and Rama the same worship takes place. Ganesha has that special honor. If you read poems by Vaishnava saints, they often have a prayer to Ganesha as part of the mangalacharana, the plea for auspiciousness.
Friend1: That is the other thing I wanted to mention. If we consult Vedic literature, such worship is quite common. Shri Rama receives the prasada of Mahadeva prior to entering Lanka to fight for Sita against Ravana. Dasharatha engages in a yajna so that his wives will become pregnant, in order to bring an heir to the throne. In the marriage ceremony for Sita and Rama, the same worship of Ganesha takes place. Shiva once describes this to Parvati, and there is the playful mention by the poet that Ganesha worship can take place even if he has not been born in that particular millennium yet.
Friend2: The gopis in Vrindavana pray to Goddess Katyayani to have Krishna as their husband.
Friend1: Even the first Govardhana Puja is predicated on demigod worship. Nanda Maharaja and the community used to regularly worship Indra, the king of heaven, for sufficient rainfall.
Friend2: Yes.
Friend1: Isn’t that a contradiction, then? His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada asserts that Krishna, Bhagavan Himself, strongly condemns such worship. Evidence is there in the Bhagavad-gita.
Friend2: I think the direct translation is that a person’s intelligence is stolen.
Friend1: And only then do they surrender to a particular deva, because they don’t understand the temporary nature of the rewards.
Friend2: Right.
Friend1: Obviously, there is a major contradiction here. I can see why the members of the institution would object.
Friend2: I don’t know. Use some common sense. You ask Ganesha for auspiciousness in a marriage ceremony and suddenly that is a big deal?
Friend1: But they do make a big deal of it.
Friend2: The way I understand it is that respect for the demigods is part of the overall culture. There are so many things you are supposed to do throughout the day. We are talking about ideal life here. Rise at a certain time. Eat specific foods on specific days. Follow this ritual at a certain age.
Friend1: Samskaras.
Friend2: There you go. Rites for purification. I have always thought of demigod worship along those lines. I am speaking of proper worship; not where your intelligence is stolen.
Friend1: Okay.
Friend2: But since we live in Kali-yuga, the dark age of quarrel and hypocrisy, it is difficult to reach that high standard. And neither is it necessary. If you simply worship the personal God, you will be okay. You will not be lacking anything. I think that is the lesson from the first Govardhana Puja, as well.
Friend1: Where people were concerned with the effects of skipping the Indra-yajna.
Friend2: The immediate impact was devastating, but Krishna took care of everything. This means that if you skip the formal rules, rituals, regulations and the like, but maintain pure devotion to Bhagavan, you will be protected.
For purity of bhakti to protect,
Worship of Ganesha to reject.
Even at marriage formality’s start,
Idea that from principles to depart.
But tradition that respect showing,
Glories of Parvati’s son knowing.
Idea that certainly within bounds,
But everything within Krishna found.
“As confirmed in the Vedanta-sutra (1.1.1), athato brahma jijnasa: without inquiry about the Supreme, or the Transcendence, one cannot give up attachment for this material world. By the evolutionary process in 8,400,000 species of life, one cannot understand the ultimate goal of life because in all those species of life, the bodily conception is very prominent. Athato brahma jijnasa means that in order to get out of the bodily conception, one has to increase attachment to or inquiry about Brahman.” (Shrimad Bhagavatam, 4.22.21 Purport)
In the end, it shouldn’t matter what public opinion says. If someone thinks their favorite player is the best, it shouldn’t have an impact on my way of life. I still can’t help it. I feel the need to argue in favor of my guy.
On the other hand, every injustice in this world could be rectified, but if I have forgotten Bhagavan then my effort is for nothing. I have not gained anything tangible, and in the future I will have to try again for something that was already within my grasp.
“There are three classes of devotees, namely the prakrita, madhyama, and maha-bhagavata. The prakrita, or third-class devotees, are temple worshipers without specific knowledge of the Lord and the Lord's devotees. The madhyama, or the second-class devotee, knows well the Lord, the Lord's devotees, the neophytes, and the nondevotees also. But the maha-bhagavata, or the first-class devotee, sees everything in relation with the Lord and the Lord present in everyone's relation. The maha-bhagavata, therefore, does not make any distinction, particularly between a devotee and nondevotee.” (Shrila Prabhupada, Shrimad Bhagavatam, 1.18.16 Purport)
My dealings with such people could involve mentoring. If I know more, I can impart wisdom. Basically, share what I have learned. Continue the chain of information transfer. This is parampara, the disciplic succession. Atma-tattva is passed down; it is not suddenly discovered through research work.
Yet their sacrifices are not made in isolation. The recorded observations and descriptions survive to this day, which means that I never have to be alone. I have the example of stalwart defenders of the tradition helping me to succeed in the ever-critical mission of remaining conscious of Bhagavan through to the time of death.
“According to the instruction of Lord Krishna, Nanda Maharaja and the cowherd men called in learned brahmanas and began to worship Govardhana Hill by chanting Vedic hymns and offering prasadam. The inhabitants of Vrindavana assembled together, decorated their cows and gave them grass. Keeping the cows in front, they began to circumambulate Govardhana Hill.” (Krishna, The Supreme Personality of Godhead, Vol 1, Ch 24)
Friend2: That’s why you need the guru, the
Friend2: Look at the first
“King Puranjana then began to think of his past dealings with his wife. He recalled that his wife would not take her dinner until he had finished his, that she would not take her bath until he had finished his, and that she was always very much attached to him, so much so that if he would sometimes become angry and chastise her, she would simply remain silent and tolerate his misbehavior.” (Shrimad Bhagavatam, 4.28.19)
Friend2: If you attend “traditional” weddings of the Vedic culture, you will hear similar advice offered to the bride. The priest tells her never to eat before her husband. It is a respect thing. Make him feel like he is the boss. Always support him. That is the formula for happiness, at least in a marriage.
Friend2: Absolutely. Always chant the holy names, be mindful of the pitfalls of attachment, and never forget Bhagavan:
“If we do not change our consciousness in this life, whatever we do in the name of social, political, religious or communal and national welfare will be the cause of our bondage. This means we have to continue in material, conditional life.” (Shrila Prabhupada, Shrimad Bhagavatam, 4.28.20 Purport)
“The voting public doesn’t seem to discern the pattern. They keep electing leaders of the same political party. It is as if this one party has a lock on the majority. No matter what they do, they will earn enough support come election time. Something has to be done. We need change. We have to clean up the government before every good person in the area leaves for a better place.”
According to
“My Lord, O Supreme Personality of Godhead, in Your holy name there is all good fortune for the living entity, and therefore You have many names, such as Krishna and Govinda, by which You expand Yourself. You have invested all Your potencies in those names, and there are no hard and fast rules for remembering them. My dear Lord, although You bestow such mercy upon the fallen, conditioned souls by liberally teaching Your holy names, I am so unfortunate that I commit offenses while chanting the holy name, and therefore I do not achieve attachment for chanting.” (Lord Chaitanya, Chaitanya Charitamrita, Antya 20.16)
Friend2: Absolutely. Goswami
Friend2: Exactly. He turns the inauspicious into auspicious. You can try it for yourself. If you are in trouble, if you are suffering through some misfortune, if you are in danger, if you are concerned over a specific outcome in the future – just focus and say the names of Krishna and Rama. You will see a change, there is no doubt. You can look back on that time later with fondness. What you initially considered to be difficult and bothersome turned into something sweet and joyful. That is the power of bhakti, which is identical to Krishna.